Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told her Brothers of Italy party on Tuesday that it should expunge from its ranks anyone who idolizes Italy’s fascist past.

Her call came after an undercover media investigation last week released a video of members of her party’s youth wing making fascist salutes and chanting “Sieg Heil.”

In a letter to party leaders, Meloni said she was “angry and saddened” that their actions damaged the group’s reputation.

“There is no room in Brothers of Italy for racism or antisemitism, nor is there space for those who are nostalgic for the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century or for any manifestation of foolish folklore,” she wrote.

“Our task is too great for those who have not understood its scope to be allowed to ruin it.”

Brothers of Italy traces its roots to a neo-fascist group set up after World War II, but Meloni herself has looked to distance herself from the far right in recent years and says her party is mainstream conservative.

Opposition parties leapt on the investigation by the online newspaper Fanpage. They said it showed Brothers of Italy was a refuge for extreme right-wingers, belying Meloni’s efforts to present a moderate image both at home and abroad.

Meloni, who last week denounced the newspaper’s undercover methods, said on Tuesday that Brothers of Italy had to be transparent and consistent.

“Anyone who believes there can be a public image of Brothers of Italy that does not correspond to their private behavior simply does not understand what we are, and thus is not welcome among us,” she said.

Fanpage published clips of youth members chanting “Duce”, a reference to Italy’s fascist leader Benito Mussolini. It also showed a group chat where someone had posted the message: “Jewish people are a race and I despise them.”

Two youth members resigned last week after the second instalment of the expose was released.

Justin Timberlake’s mugshot has been turned into work of art at a gallery in the same town he was arrested with DWI charges on June 18.

The Warhol-esque image of the pop star has led to nonstop lines and pedestrians stopping by at the local Romany Kramoris Gallery to take a photo of the work, Page Six reported.

Romany Kramoris, who has been operating her gallery for 44 years, recalled her reaction at the time artist Godfrey Lohman introduced her to his limited edition piece.

“My reaction was, ‘Oh my God!’ That’s great! It’s just great!” Kramoris, affectionately known around town as the ‘Queen of Sag Harbor,’ told the publication.

The gallery has sold ‘two or three’ of the works, estimated at $520, with a lot of people ‘coming back,’ Kramoris added.

Kramoris announced that the gallery plans to carry the pieces throughout the summer.

“The green one is not my favorite. He looks a little sickly, too many martinis on the green one,” she joked.

This comes after a bartender at the American Hotel, which is two doors down from Kramoris’ gallery, confirmed to People that the singer only had one martini at their bar before his arrest.

“If he was drinking more, it wasn’t here,” the outlet quoted their source.

Jocelyn Nungaray, the 12-year-old girl killed in Texas, was sexually assaulted before being strangled, according to recent forensic tests.

The child’s family also confirmed to Fox 26 that she was sexually assaulted.

Two Venezuelan nationals — 21-year-old Johan Jose Martinez-Rangel and 26-year-old Franklin Jose Peña Ramos — are charged with capital murder in Jocelyn’s death. The two men crossed illegally into the U.S. earlier this year.

Both suspects are accused of luring Jocelyn under a bridge and sexually assaulting her before she was strangled to death and left in a creek.

JOCELYN NUNGARAY MURDER: TEXAS COUNTY DUBBED ‘SANCTUARY FOR CRIMINALS’ AS DEM DA TRIES TO SHIFT BLAME

Jocelyn Nungaray, 12, was found strangled to death in a Houston creek. (Fox Houston courtesy of the Nungaray family)

The Harris County District Attorney’s Office received the lab results in connection with the investigation into Jocelyn’s death.

While the test results show she appeared to have been sexually assaulted, as semen was found on her, the DNA match has not come back yet, a source close to the investigation told Fox News.

The Harris County District Attorney’s Office said in a statement to Fox News it will have “no comment on the evidence in this case until the appropriate time.” The Houston Forensic Science Center declined to provide details.

The family now awaits the court’s acknowledgment of the new evidence, and seeks a revoked bond as they look for justice in Jocelyn’s death.

Jocelyn’s grandfather, Kelvin Alvarenga, told Fox 26 that it is going to be nearly impossible for the family to “get rid of this feeling of loss.”

If the suspects are found guilty of sexually assaulting Jocelyn, they would be eligible for the death penalty. But Jocelyn’s family opposes the death penalty and would rather the suspects sit with what they did for the rest of their lives.

“I want them to remember Jocy the rest of their life,” Melfri Vargas, Alvarenga’s wife, told Fox 26. “I want, every time they go to sleep, they remember what they did and show the others you don’t mess with our child, you don’t mess with the United States, you don’t mess with Texas.”

Franklin Jose Peña Ramos, left, and Johan Jose Martinez-Rangel have been charged in the killing of Jocelyn Nungaray in Houston, Texas. (Harris County Jail)

With the suspects in this case being two illegal immigrants, Jocelyn’s death has sparked political discourse over U.S. immigration policy.

“I want them not to just use my granddaughter as a political base, but to know her name is Jocelyn Nungaray,” Alvarenga told Fox 26. “We just want to make a difference for Jocy. We don’t want Jocy’s memory or name to be easily forgotten.”

Alvarenga would like the individuals responsible for Jocelyn’s death to face life without parole, stressing the importance for them to be reminded everyday of what they did to the girl.

“I rather for them to remember this in general population,” he said. “Life without parole, that way they can remember every night when they go to bed, the horrific deal that they did to our family.”

With Jocelyn’s death in national headlines, her family says they are grateful for the support they have received from city and state leaders, and former President Trump.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT SUSPECT ACCUSED OF KILLING JOCELYN NUNGARAY WORE ICE ANKLE MONITOR

Jocelyn Nungaray, 12, was sexually assaulted before being strangled, according to recent forensic tests. (Getty Images)

“God bless him, because at the telling of the day, I wouldn’t want my daughter’s accident to go as another statistic for the city of Houston or the state of Texas. With former President Trump reaching out, my blessings to him and God bless him,” Alvarenga said.

Jocelyn’s mother, Alexis Nungaray, has been struggling in the aftermath of her daughter’s death, Alexis’ father told Fox 26. Jocelyn’s five-year-old brother also asks for his sister every day and wishes to be with her.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“She’s a single mom and one of the hardest things for her and us to explain to a five-year-old that his Cici will not be at home anymore,” Vargas said. “He asks when is he going to see Cici. We try to explain the best way we can to a little one. It’s not an easy thing to do. He always asks for her, he wants to go see her.”

The two suspects are due back in court in September.

Fox News’ Nate Foy contributed to this report.

TAIPEI, Taiwan — Taiwan said the Chinese coast guard boarded a Taiwanese fishing boat Tuesday before steering it to a port in mainland China, and demanded that Beijing release the vessel.

The Tachinman 88 was intercepted by two Chinese vessels Tuesday evening near the Kinmen archipelago, which lies a short distance off China’s coast but is controlled by Taiwan, Taiwanese maritime authorities said in a statement.

Taiwan dispatched three vessels to rescue the Tachinman 88, but the one that got close to the fishing boat was blocked by three Chinese boats and told not to interfere, the statement said. The pursuit was called off to avoid escalating the conflict after Taiwan’s maritime authorities detected that four more Chinese vessels were moving closer, the statement added.

“The Coast Guard calls on the mainland to refrain from engaging in political manipulation and harming cross-strait relations, and to release the Tachinman ship and crew as soon as possible,” the statement read.

The boat had six crew onboard, including the captain and five migrant workers, according to Taiwan’s official Central News Agency. The vessel was just over 12 miles away from Jinjiang in mainland China when it was boarded, Taiwanese authorities said.

China claims self-governing Taiwan as its territory and says the island must come under its control. The Chinese military regularly sends warplanes and ships toward the island and staged a large exercise with dozens of aircraft and vessels in May.

Fishermen from both Taiwan and China regularly sail the stretch of water near the Kinmen archipelago, which has seen a rise in tensions as the number of Chinese vessels — including sand dredgers and fishing boats — has notably increased in the area.

In February, two Chinese fishermen drowned while being chased by Taiwan’s Coast Guard off the coast of Kinmen, prompting Beijing to step up patrols in the waters.

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Find out more

In 2010, a Dutch woman named Natalie decided she wanted to have a child. “It’s not easy if you’re a lesbian,” she recalls with a chuckle. “I can’t just go out and have some fun and become pregnant. It takes a little bit of planning.”

After ruling out male friends, Natalie went online and weighed up her options. At first, she considered a donor clinic, but was put off by the Dutch law that prevents donor-conceived children from learning the identity of the donor until they turn 16. “I was afraid there could be an identity crisis lying ahead,” she explains. “That’s something I don’t wish for any child.”

Instead, she turned to a website called “Longing for a Child”. There, she found dating site-style profiles for a number of potential donors. After an unsuccessful meet-up with a man called Leon, she landed on what she’d been searching for in a good-looking, curly-haired young man called Jonathan Jacob Meijer.

“He was perfect in every way,” remembers Natalie. “The looks were there, the intelligence was there, the way he talked was there. Everything that for me was important, was there.” When they met, they spoke about why Meijer had decided to become a sperm donor, and he said he’d been inspired by a college friend who was infertile. “He told me he wanted to help five families, and that I would be number three,” says Natalie. “That was his story back then.”

With Meijer’s help, Natalie had a son. “The first eight years were perfect,” she says. “There was nothing to worry about.” Then one day, Natalie’s partner Suzanne was enjoying a morning coffee and reading the newspaper when she came across a story about a Dutch sperm donor who had fathered hundreds of children, far more than the 25-child limit imposed by national law. The man matched Meijer’s description. “That’s how we found out that he donated way more children than we ever imagined,” says Suzanne.

open image in gallery

Natalie and Suzanne are just two of the many mothers featured in Netflix’s shocking new three-part docuseries The Man with 1000 Kids. The women involved are separated by continents, spread across Europe, Africa and Australia, but united by a feeling that they were misled and betrayed. It would emerge that Meijer had donated sperm to multiple fertility clinics in the Netherlands – at least 11 by 2023, according to court records – and they say he had told each of them he had not donated elsewhere. He also travelled the world to give private donations. Speaking to The Independent, Meijer admitted he had not been “open” with the women, but denied some of the other accusations made about him in the documentary.

For Natalie and Suzanne, their feeling of betrayal was amplified by the fact that they had spoken to Meijer less than a year earlier about having another child with him. Suzanne had wanted to use the same donor so the couple’s children would be biological siblings, so they met up with Meijer once again. “We asked him how many children he had, and he said: ‘25’,” recalls Suzanne. “We thought it sounded like a lot. He told us that some families had a second or even third child with him, and that he’d been doing it for a few years. He said it was normal, and we believed him.”

They attempted to go through with a second insemination, but it failed. The couple were by that time a little relieved, having been put off by Meijer’s actions. While he had previously donated his sperm at their home, this time he had arranged to meet them in a public place. “I think the rock bottom in our story is that at some point he wanted to meet in a shopping mall,” says Suzanne. “He went into a public restroom. Natalie called me, like ‘What the f***?’ I told her: ‘This is not right.’” Natalie squirms beside her. “I felt really uncomfortable,” she says. “It felt like we were doing a drug deal. It’s not the place where you go to make a baby.”

After they learned the truth about Meijer, Natalie and Suzanne joined a Facebook group filled with other mothers who had used his donations. They were stunned by what they saw. “You’d show a photo and someone would say: ‘Oh, that looks just like child A, B, C and D,’” recalls Suzanne. “At that moment it felt like having an Ikea bookcase. ‘Oh, I see you have the Billy! Great bookcase, we have that too!’ If you have a donor child, that can happen. But at this scale, it’s unheard of. It’s not that we are worried that our child is not unique, but it’s about the implications of this. If the children meet each other later in life, they might find each other romantically attractive – and then what?”

For the mothers, the biggest concern isn’t that Meijer lied to them or even the sheer scale of his biological brood. It’s the potentially incestuous dangers that lie in wait for their children, and for generations to come.

The total number of children that Meijer has fathered is unknown. In 2023, he admitted in court to having fathered at least 550 children, before a Dutch judge made the unprecedented decision to ban him from donating to sperm banks. He could be fined €100,000 (£84,700) each time he breaks the court order. In recent videos posted to his YouTube channel, Meijer has claimed that the title The Man with 1000 Kids is misleading, but in truth even he may not know the actual number, because the international sperm banks he used, such as the Danish-based Cryos, are not required to inform him about the children who result from his donations.

For the sake of argument, if Meijer has 500 children, within 100 years he could be expected to have 150,000 descendants walking the Earth. “This is about our children and the way their lives are impacted,” says Suzanne. “They can never just date somebody or have intercourse with somebody, they will always need to take care and even then they might not be aware that they’re a donor child. It’s a very dangerous and unhealthy situation for these children, and for their children and grandchildren.”

“It’s a public health hazard waiting to happen,” adds Natalie. “It’s not about the number, it’s about the dangers that lie beneath the number. The bigger the number, the more dangerous it is.”

Suzanne raises a further worry. “What if even one of these children becomes a donor, if they’re not aware?” she asks. “Or even if they are aware,” adds Natalie. “But they have the same way of thinking as Jonathan had: ‘F*** it! Let’s do it!’”

There are no international laws governing sperm donation, and the field is largely unregulated. The mothers have little recourse besides trying to spread the word about the scale of Meijer’s actions. “That’s why we’re still raising awareness, and hoping that there is a government that wants to put up legislation because that needs to happen,” says Natalie. “Not just in individual countries, but globally. He is not stopping at borders, and he’s not the only one. There are more out there.”

As The Man with 1000 Kids explores, Meijer may well be particularly prolific but he is by no means the only “super donor” operating today. Natalie later learned that Leon, the first donor she had considered, has fathered somewhere in the region of 415 children. She now believes the two men were secretly behind the “Longing for a Child” website, and that they were competing with each other to have the highest number of children. The docuseries uncovers further examples of men traveling the world to donate unrestricted amounts of sperm, including a racist who expresses his desire to donate to Kenyan clinics out of a desire to “bleach Africa”.

open image in gallery

“They know each other and they collaborate,” says Suzanne. “We need laws to prevent this. I know the HFEA [Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority] put out a statement to say it’s not possible in the UK, but they don’t know what’s happening behind closed doors.” Natalie nods her head in agreement. “We need a ruling that you can find someone punishable by law, so that they will think before donating their sperm in these amounts,” she says.

As it stands, governments have generally been wary of any laws that curb procreation. Suzanne believes it’s time that changed. “We regulate what women do with their bodies,” she points out. “We regulate surrogacy. There are clear rules about this all around the world. Why can’t we tell people how much they can procreate? Why not? Because it’s men?”

Today, neither Natalie and Suzanne are in touch with Meijer. He has blocked them both on WhatsApp, so they’re no longer able to talk to him about their son. He continues to post regular updates to his YouTube channel, including from trips to Finland and Zanzibar. In recent videos, he complains that Netflix is misleading people about him. “After the amount of care we’ve put into the documentary, it’s sad to hear that response,” says Suzanne. “Especially coming from somebody who is basically a fraud.”

When reached for comment by The Independent, Meijer claimed that he stopped donating to new recipients in 2019, and denied many of the accusations made against him in the documentary. He says he never collaborated with or competed against other donors, and denies the most shocking accusation in the series, that he and Leon mixed their sperm together before giving it to a recipient in order to see whose would “win”. “That’s total slander,” he says. “It’s insane. Why should I do that? Why should anyone do that? If it’s in the documentary, be prepared, I will definitely sue the hell out of the whole Netflix crew.”

Meijer declined multiple invitations to participate in the documentary himself. “He was given a right to respond,” says Natalie. “His comments are always: ‘This is untrue and the women are just angry mothers.’ We’re not angry. We just want him to stop.”

‘The Man with 1000 Kids’ is on Netflix

Support truly
independent journalism

Find out moreClose

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Around £235 million is expected to be withdrawn from ATMs on Thursday as people fit trips to cash machines around casting their General Election votes, according to a forecast from UK cash access and cash machine network Link.

The network expects the total to be lower than it was on December 12 2019, when the last general election was held.

On that date, which resulted in Boris Johnson returning to Downing Street as Conservative prime minister, £322 million was withdrawn. Link said that early December tended to be a slightly busier time for cash machine withdrawals.

And on the general election date of June 8 2017, which led to the then-prime minister Theresa May’s election gamble backfiring as the Conservatives’ Commons majority was erased, some £356 million was taken out of ATMs.

On Thursday last week (June 27), £240 million was dispensed from ATMs, according to Link’s figures.

The data applies only to Link transactions, which are made in situations when a bank customer uses an ATM belonging to another provider. The vast majority of ATMs across the UK are connected to the Link network.

Link said that the earlier part of the summer tended to see an upswing in cash machine transactions as people got out and about, but that the network often saw a dip in ATM transactions in August, as many UK residents headed off on holidays abroad.

Graham Mott, director of strategy at Link said: “Polling day traditionally itself doesn’t seem to make a huge difference to ATM use when compared to a normal Thursday at that time of year, people seem to fit voting around their normal routine.

“Early December is normally slightly busier than either early June or July but the vast majority of the fall in ATM use is down to people now using less cash overall and increasingly using cards and their phones to make day-to-day payments.”

In 2023, legislation was passed as part of the Financial Services and Markets Act, to protect access to cash.

A recent survey for Link indicated that nearly half (48%) of people expected to see a cashless society in their lifetime.

But according to Link’s data, the average UK adult still withdrew around £1,500 from cash machines last year.

In June, banknotes bearing the King’s portrait started to be issued.

This marked the first time that the sovereign has been changed on the Bank of England’s notes, because the late Queen was the first British monarch to be depicted on a note in 1960.

The new banknotes are co-circulating alongside those featuring the late Queen.

There are more than 4.6 billion Bank of England notes in circulation, worth around £82 billion.

Mr Mott said that 99.8% of UK high streets had free cash access within one kilometre, adding: “Link will also make sure this is still the case by the time of the next general election, whenever that is.”

Roared on by their devoted travelling fans, Colombia were the better side in Tuesday’s 1-1 draw with Brazil that brings the Copa America group phase to a close. The Selecao nearly snatched the win right at the end, when Andreas Pereira had a shot from the edge of the area athletically tipped over by keeper Camilo Vargas. But it would have been an injustice.

In the warmth of the Santa Clara sunshine, this was a match that was always going to generate plenty of heat along with moments of light. A rivalry has developed between these two sides that, in front of a packed house, was likely to spill over. Colombia took the field with their place in the quarterfinals guaranteed and, barring a mathematical miracle, so did Brazil. There was a clear case for taking a foot off the pedal and resting key player, especially those who were a yellow card away from a suspension.

It was a case that neither nation heeded. Both teams held nothing back and Colombia will go into their quarterfinal without key midfielder Jefferson Lerma. Brazil, though, came out of it worse. They will be without Vinícius Júnior. And, topping the group after the 1-1 draw, Colombia meet the Copa’s surprise side Panama. Brazil, meanwhile, are off to face the far more dangerous Uruguay. And, with the Brazil players having to put up with prolonged second half cries of “ole” from the Colombian fans as their team stroked the ball around the field, an obvious question comes to mind: Was it all worth it?

Uruguay have an extra day to rest before Saturday’s quarterfinal. In hindsight, might Brazil have been better advised to rest their most important players — especially those on a yellow card — and keep the gunpowder dry for Marcelo Bielsa’s Uruguay?

The bright side was that Brazil scored their first goal direct from a free kick since a strike by Phillippe Coutinho against South Korea in November 2019. And they very nearly had a second. After giving his side an early lead with a superb strike over the defensive wall, Raphinha nearly added a second after the interval, sending a cross shot just wide. And, predictably, he and Vinicius on the flanks caused plenty of problems for the Colombian full-backs. Vinicius was probably unfortunate not to win a penalty off Daniel Muñoz when the score was still 1-0, but there was not enough end product. There are moments when the lack of a genuine centre-forward is a problem. And credit must be given to the covering of the Colombian centre-backs, especially the much-maligned Davinson Sánchez, whose pace was important when Vinicius cut inside.

But Brazil’s main problem was in midfield. There was an understandable need to protect veteran right back Danilo against the fire and skill of Luis Díaz, and so João Gomes came across to help him. But this left James Rodríguez able to find too much space, and he roamed the field finding little pockets from which to dictate the play.

His set pieces were also a constant threat. He clipped the bar with an early free kick, crossed in for a Sanchez goal ruled out for a narrow offside and continually found a way to worry the Brazil defence. Colombia were wasting chances and already deserved to be level when Rodriguez helped set up the equaliser just before half-time, passing infield for John Cordoba to play the pivot role, turning and slipping Munoz to burst into space and poke past Alisson Becker.

Lucas Paquetá may have been at fault for not tracking the run, and he was withdrawn at the interval. But things worsened without him. His replacement Pereira found it hard to pick up the pace of the game, and, aside from that late shot, was barely noted. In the second half Brazil could not pass their way down the field, and Colombia took control. They should have taken the lead, the clearest chance coming when Diaz set up substitute Rafael Santos Borre, who shot over an open goal. Later in the competition — perhaps even in a semifinal against Brazil — Colombia may be punished for their problems turning chances into goals.

Brazil, meanwhile, will have to put up with criticism from their own media. In a game that they needed to win if they wished to avoid Uruguay, coach Dorival Junior waited until the 86th minute to introduce striker Endrick. And now, with aching limbs and probably a few extra doubts about their capacity to go all the way in this competition, they head to Arizona for a shootout with Uruguay.

A crumb of comfort. The bottom five in South America’s World Cup qualification table have all changed coaches since that competition got underway in September. After an astonishingly bad 2023, Brazil are among them. The other four — Paraguay, Chile, Bolívia and Peru — have shown no improvement. All have been eliminated from the Copa, with not a win between them and scarcely a goal. Brazil, though, are unbeaten and still in the hunt. They are going to have to climb Everest the hard way if they are to win this Copa, but at least amid the odd flash of talent against Colombia they showed plenty of fighting spirit.

Dear Haya,

Sometimes I feel envious and jealous of other people for their achievements that I have always wanted for myself. I don’t wish bad for them, but it definitely would be nice to also have my dreams and aspirations accomplished. I cannot bear to see them having it all, while I struggle to make a mark.

The feelings often lead me to thinking negatively and often despising these people without even knowing them closely. I feel resentful towards them and seeing them get continued success is really frustrating.

Does this make me a bad person?

Dear reader,

Seeing other people live the life you want can be frustrating. Having feelings of envy and jealousy doesn’t make you a bad person. Its natural to feel depleted and demotivated and envy and jealousy are natural human emotions that everyone may experience at some point in their lives. What matters is how you manage and respond to these feelings.

Lets break down to see what’s going on and what we can do.

First of all, acknowledge your emotions. It’s crucial to recognise and accept that you are feeling envious or jealous. Suppressing or denying these feelings can lead to more intense negative emotions over time.

Ask yourself : what’s making me feel this way? Get curious about the root cause. Is it because they have reached there before you? Are there specific areas of your life where you feel inadequate?

It’s great to have aspirations and goals but at the same time expectations need to be managed and realistic.

I would encourage you to conduct an audit of your own life. Compare yourself with where you were in the past, what you have accomplished so far. Set achievable goals and celebrate your progress, no matter how small.

We see people’s outcomes, but we don’t see their journeys. We don’t know what they have been through and what all it took for them to get there. Everyone’s path is different. What you see on the surface is often not the full story. Focus on your growth and the steps you need to take to achieve your own aspirations.

Focusing on what we have versus what we don’t have allows us to live in abundance. And abundance attracts abundance. When we focus on what we don’t have we continue to live in lack.

Ever heard the saying, comparison is the thief of joy? That’s because it is. Comparing to others will take away any good you have. Instead, a perspective shift could be to see their journeys as a way to seek inspiration and see if there are strategies or mindsets you could adopt.

Understand that the road to success is not linear. And in that journey of ups and down developing self-compassion is critical. Be kind to yourself, its okay to have setbacks – they don’t define your worth or potential.

Allow yourself to grieve accept and embrace all emotions that come up.

Remember, personal growth and achievement are not a zero-sum game. Others’ successes do not diminish your potential or worth. Its ok to feel disappointed in not being where you thought you would. Working through these feelings, allowing yourself to feel all what you feel, channeling your feelings into positive actions and working towards a healthier mindset can all lead to personal growth.

If you continue to feel too overwhelmed and frustrated , I encourage you to work with a life coach who will aid you in reaching your goals.

Haya

Haya Malik is a psychotherapist, Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) practitioner, corporate well-being strategist and trainer with expertise in creating organisational cultures focused on well-being and raising awareness around mental health.

Send her your questions to [email protected]

Note: The advice and opinions above are those of the author and specific to the query. We strongly recommend our readers consult relevant experts or professionals for personalised advice and solutions. The author and Geo.tv do not assume any responsibility for the consequences of actions taken based on the information provided herein. All published pieces are subject to editing to enhance grammar and clarity.